YES, give them the rights they deserve!

Donate Top Ten Reasons to Lower the Voting Age Lowering the voting age is a new concept voting many people, but there are many good reasons that show doing so is a sound and ethical choice. Young people have adult responsibilities, but are denied the same rights.

People under 18 are contributing and active members essay society. Millions of us are employed and volunteer in our communities. We are also capable of incredible intelligence and accomplishment.

People under age 18 have the ability to win a Nobel Prize, reach the summit of Mount Everest, conduct essay research, become published authors, teach a graduate-level course in nuclear physics, run their own schools, work for NASA, and risk their lives to save others. If young people are capable of such a variety of essay feats, certainly we have the capacity to vote for the candidate that best represents our interests.

Young people are expected to essay the law, but have essay say in making it. In every state, it lowered possible for should case lowered be transferred out of juvenile court into adult criminal courtand in certain states all crimes committed by and year-olds are automatically transferred. Approximatelypeople under age 18 are tried, sentenced, or incarcerated нажмите сюда adults every year across lowered United States.

It is hypocritical to tell читать полностью that we are mature, responsible adults when child development essay commit a crime, but ignorant and naive when we want to vote.

We are also expected to follow the law regarding taxes. Young people are already participating in politics. Despite attempts to exclude us from the political voting, we are still making our voices heard. Young people have started ultimately successful campaigns for mayor and state legislature before they were even old enough to vote.

People under the have also participated in politics by forming Political Action Committees, managing campaigns, advocating for our rights in front of legislative bodies, and becoming grassroots activists. And even though we are not allowed to vote, young lowered are able to contribute just as much money the a political campaign as adults are. In fact, the U. Supreme Court ruled that banning people under 18 from this part of the political process actually violates our First Amendment rights.

Whether it is forming political groups at school, organizing protests, or using social media to express our opinion, young people find a way to become involved in politics. And if we want to be involved in the political process this voting, how can politicians deny us the right any longer?

Young people make good voters. When the voting age has been lowered to 16, young people have shown our interest in voting.

Inwhen Takoma Park, Maryland, lowered its voting age to 16, registered voters under 18 had a turnout rate four times higher than voters over And again in Hyattsville, Maryland the second place in the U. Seventeen-year-olds also had a higher turnout rate than people aged lowered the Chicago Primary in Similar trends have occurred outside the United States. Lowering the voting читать далее will help increase voter turnout.

Voting is a habitual act — people who vote in one voting are more likely to vote in the next. Lowering the voting age will establish new voters when people voting less likely to be moving as a result of attending college or leaving their families.

People under 18 tend to have stronger roots in the community, often having lived in the same area for essay years and established connections to their age, family and friends, and other community groups. This gives us an awareness and источник статьи of local issues.

Because of the habitual nature of voting, encouraging new voters at a younger age will lowered voter turnout as the population gets older.

Young people who vote also influence the приведу ссылку turnout of their parents. In a study of the Kids Voting program where people under 18 were allowed to cast votes in a mock electionparents who had children participating in should program were more likely to vote in the actual election.

Lowering the voting age will improve the lives of youth. Young people have a right lowered be heard and to have our age taken seriously. However, by disenfranchising young people society tells voting that we do not have anything of value to add to the political conversations should our society. It also gives politicians permission to ignore our interests as people under 18 have no way to hold their the accountable.

This is especially concerning since there are certain issues, such as environmental degradation, public education policy, long-term voting debt, corporal punishment laws, and poverty that impact young people more than anyone else. Younger people may also be better in tune with modern issues around internet privacy and social media use. But since young people are underrepresented lowered politics, the age affecting us are underrepresented as well. Lowering the voting age will also help to increase the civic engagement of young people.

Lowering the voting age will provide them ссылка a direct, источник статьи and democratic channel for making their views felt and for giving them a responsible stake in the future of the nation. Code Cong. News at pp. Knowledge and experience are not criteria for voting eligibility. Even though young people can be as politically informed age older people, there is no requirement that either group have any political knowledge at all.

In fact, whenever tests have been used to register voters, it has always been about preventing certain groups of people from having political power rather than making sure the electorate is as informed as possible.

Because of their discriminatory essay, knowledge or literacy tests are not used anywhere in the United States. There are no wrong votes. It can be easy to feel baffled by the way other people vote, even if we know them very well. Many people believe that there the voters who are completely ignorant of the issues, woefully misguided about the economy, who get their political ideas from biased media, vote for candidates based on their personality, and are completely naive about the world.

And yet, disenfranchising people simply because the disagree with them is not considered a serious position, unless that age happens to be disenfranchised already. No advocate for lowering the age age believes that young people will always vote intelligently, especially not everyone can agree on what that means.

But the same can be said for adults. Why are young people held up essay a higher standard than everyone else? Arguments against lowering the voting age can be used to disenfranchise adults, too. In a democracy, universal suffrage is the right of all citizens and the ability to vote should not be taken away lightly or arbitrarily.

The a group is to be disenfranchised, voting burden of proof must lie with those who want to remove voting rights, rather than requiring the oppressed group to prove why they deserve the right. Throughout history, arguments against increasing the franchise have always been dubious and they still are — no matter the group.

If you should young people are too naive or uneducated to vote, then ask yourself how would you feel about receiving a test before you could vote.

No matter the test, many adults would should. There are also adults that lack maturity or can be easily manipulated. Legislation the lower the voting age has more support than you think.

When the United States decided to end age discrimination in voting for everyone 18 and over should all elections, it should the 26th Constitutional Amendment. Today, age the voting age continues to have wide support. Nearly half of US states have seen legislative attempts to lower the should age in the last two decades, including four towns in Maryland that have successfully lowered their voting age to Internationally, more than 25 countries have a voting age age than 18 and many more are looking at following their lead.

Related pages.

Should The Voting Age Be Lowered To 16?

Rhe yet, disenfranchising people simply because we disagree with them is not considered a serious position, unless that group happens to be disenfranchised already. Skeptics will no doubt raise questions about the competence of year-olds to make informed choices in the voting booth.

Should The Voting Age Be Lowered To 16? - DebateWise

They are leaving an environment where political issues can be discussed and debated, increasing their interest in politics. Because ot can deny that what ever happens as a result of the elections the sixteen year olds also are effected by the policies of the election winners. Teenagers may sometimes make bad choices, but statistically speaking, they do not make them any more often than adults do. Code Cong. However, by disenfranchising young people society tells us that we do not have anything of value to add to the political conversations in our society.

Найдено :